feat(nono): add restrictive core policy contract
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,6 +4,10 @@
|
||||
|
||||
A Slice 0 `node scripts/pi-links.mjs prune --dry-run` from `.worktrees/nono-dynamic-permissions-slice-zero-direct` exited 2 and classified every active link into the primary checkout as an outside-repository conflict. The tool anchors ownership to the current worktree root, while active links correctly target the primary repository checkout. Teach check and dry-run planning to recognize canonical checkouts sharing the same Git common directory without broadening stale-link deletion to unrelated repositories. Add linked-worktree fixtures before changing prune behavior. Until fixed, run host reconciliation only from the integrated primary checkout.
|
||||
|
||||
## Harden Nono 0.74 command-policy and resolved-policy diagnostics
|
||||
|
||||
Slice 1 found two Nono 0.74 limitations while building behavioral policy proofs. First, command-policy startup fails with `path must be shorter than SUN_LEN` when Nono creates its supervisor socket beneath a moderately long isolated `TMPDIR` such as `/tmp/nono-slice-one-*/sessions/personal/tmp`. Before broker profiles activate command policies, reproduce the maximum safe path, then have the launcher select a private short socket root or confirm an upstream fix. Second, `nono profile show --json` omits resolved `environment`, `command_policies`, `network.connect_port`, and `network.custom_credentials` fields even though strict validation and live enforcement accept them. Do not treat resolved JSON as complete evidence for these capabilities; retain behavioral `nono run` and `nono why --command` proofs until the output is complete and regression-tested.
|
||||
|
||||
## Replace `pi-workflow` with a skill-based orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
The strict `pi-workflow` extension repeatedly failed before implementation because planner output and persisted state-machine constraints were too brittle for adaptive subagent orchestration. In a separate session, design a repository-managed skill where the main Pi agent owns the plan, task tree, isolated worktree, explicit user approval gates, verification, and independent review while launching standard `scout` and `worker` subagents directly. Preserve file-ownership boundaries, no inferred approvals, review independence, and resumable repository evidence, but prefer native Pi primitives over a custom orchestration engine. Evaluate a small committed state manifest for crash recovery before retiring or archiving the extension. Use the abandoned `.worktrees/pi-workflow-plan-seed` implementation only as reference; do not integrate it by default.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user