From b4e71b47db4af3455ab665050f51b96c0bed3959 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: JB Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 10:46:47 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] docs: record dirty source resolution --- docs/workflow/develop-workflow-record.md | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/workflow/develop-workflow-record.md b/docs/workflow/develop-workflow-record.md index f0c5030..721093f 100644 --- a/docs/workflow/develop-workflow-record.md +++ b/docs/workflow/develop-workflow-record.md @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ ## Status -- Status: blocked -- Current phase: local integration -- Next safe action: resolve the pre-existing dirty source-checkout change through an explicit user decision before fast-forward integration. +- Status: active +- Current phase: source synchronization +- Next safe action: commit the exact pre-existing artifact-presenter YAML quoting change separately on `main`, then rebase, reverify, and review the feature again. ## Request and scope @@ -210,5 +210,6 @@ Rebase the feature branch onto the latest remote/local `main` when available, re - Review cycle 2: specification approved; standards requested removal of two dead-code items. Both reviewers remained read-only. - Remediation cycle 2: parent removed both items; focused tests, `bun run typecheck`, and `bun run test` exited 0. - Review cycle 3: standards and specification approved the exact fingerprint with no findings; both reviewers remained read-only. -- Integration blocker: primary checkout `main` still contains the pre-existing uncommitted YAML quoting change in `skills/document/artifact-presenter/SKILL.md`. The reviewed feature does not touch that path, but the approved workflow requires a clean source checkout. -- Next safe action: commit this approval evidence, ask the user to preserve, discard, or leave the source change blocked, then integrate only after the source checkout is clean. +- Source-checkout decision: on 04SEP2026 the user explicitly chose to preserve the exact pre-existing YAML quoting change in a separate `main` commit. This authorizes only that one-file commit; it does not broaden feature scope. +- Consequence: after `main` advances, rebase the feature, rerun full verification, regenerate the fingerprint, and obtain fresh independent approval before integration. +- Next safe action: commit this gate decision, then create the exact separate source commit.