Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into merge/main-into-dev

# Conflicts:
#	CLAUDE.md
#	nix/package.nix
#	packages/app/src/components/combined-model-selector.tsx
#	packages/app/src/hooks/use-sidebar-workspaces-list.ts
#	packages/app/src/screens/workspace/workspace-screen.tsx
#	packages/app/src/stores/session-store.test.ts
#	packages/server/src/client/daemon-client.ts
#	packages/server/src/server/agent/agent-manager.ts
#	packages/server/src/server/session.ts
#	packages/server/src/server/session.workspace-git-watch.test.ts
#	packages/server/src/server/session.workspaces.test.ts
#	packages/server/src/shared/messages.ts
This commit is contained in:
Mohamed Boudra
2026-04-08 11:38:17 +07:00
90 changed files with 6284 additions and 923 deletions
+10 -1
View File
@@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ There are two supported ways to ship from `main`:
## Standard release (patch)
Before running any stable patch release command:
- Make sure the intended release commit is already committed to `main` and the working tree is clean.
- Make sure local `npm run typecheck` passes on that commit.
- Do not use `npm run release:patch` as a substitute for checking whether the current commit is actually ready.
```bash
npm run release:patch
```
@@ -24,6 +30,7 @@ Use the direct stable path when the current `main` changes are ready to become t
## Manual step-by-step
```bash
npm run typecheck # Verify the exact commit you intend to release
npm run release:check # Typecheck, build, dry-run pack
npm run version:all:patch # Bump version, create commit + tag
npm run release:publish # Publish to npm
@@ -131,7 +138,7 @@ Load the `paseo` skill and launch a **Codex 5.4** agent with a prompt like:
> Review the diff between the latest release tag and HEAD. Focus on:
>
> 1. **Breaking changes** — especially in the WebSocket protocol, agent lifecycle, and any server↔client contract.
> 2. **Backward compatibility** — mobile apps lag behind desktop/daemon updates by days. Users will update desktop and daemon immediately but keep running the old app. Flag anything that requires both sides to update in lockstep.
> 2. **Backward compatibility** — the important direction is old app clients talking to newly updated daemons. Users update desktop and daemon first, then keep running the old app for a while. Flag anything that breaks old clients against new daemons or requires both sides to update in lockstep.
> 3. **Regressions** — anything that looks like it could break existing functionality.
>
> Diff: `git diff <latest-release-tag>..HEAD`
@@ -150,6 +157,8 @@ In other words, RCs are checkpoints along the way; the changelog only records th
## Completion checklist
- [ ] Run the pre-release sanity check (see above) and address any findings
- [ ] Ensure the intended release commit is already committed and the git worktree is clean before running any `release:*` patch/promote command
- [ ] Ensure local `npm run typecheck` passes on that exact commit before running any `release:*` patch/promote command
- [ ] Update `CHANGELOG.md` with user-facing release notes (features, fixes — not refactors)
- [ ] Verify the changelog heading follows strict `## X.Y.Z - YYYY-MM-DD` format
- [ ] `npm run release:patch` or `npm run release:promote` completes successfully
+68
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# Plan Approval Normalization
## Goal
Normalize plan approval across providers so the UI renders one consistent plan approval card and action row, while each provider keeps its own execution quirks behind the session permission interface.
## Compatibility Constraints
- Older clients must remain compatible with newer daemons.
- All new wire fields must be optional.
- Existing plan permissions without action metadata must still render and work.
- Existing question permissions must keep their current behavior.
## Design
### Shared abstraction
Add optional permission action definitions to the shared permission request/response types.
- Permission requests may include `actions`.
- Permission responses may include `selectedActionId`.
- `kind: "plan"` remains the normalized concept for plan approval.
- The UI renders actions from the permission request instead of hardcoding provider-specific buttons.
### Claude
Keep Claude's plan permission flow, but enrich it with explicit action definitions.
- Always expose `Reject`.
- Always expose `Implement`.
- If the agent entered plan mode from a more permissive mode like `bypassPermissions`, also expose `Implement with <previous mode>`.
- Resolve the selected action entirely inside `respondToPermission()`.
### Codex
Synthesize a normalized `kind: "plan"` permission after a Codex plan-mode turn completes with a plan result.
- Emit a plan permission with `Reject` and `Implement` actions.
- On `Implement`, disable `plan_mode`, disable `fast_mode`, and automatically start a follow-up implementation turn.
- On `Reject`, resolve without starting a follow-up turn.
- Keep the implementation prompt and state transitions inside the Codex provider.
### Manager and state sync
After permission resolution, refresh provider-derived state so the UI sees internal mode/feature changes without knowing provider quirks.
- Refresh current mode
- Refresh pending permissions
- Refresh runtime info
- Refresh features
- Persist refreshed state
### UI
Render plan permissions through the existing plan card, but generate buttons from normalized permission actions.
- If `actions` are absent, fall back to legacy buttons.
- Plan cards should use `Implement` as the default primary label.
- Do not add provider-specific rendering branches.
## Verification
1. Shared schema/type tests for optional `actions` and `selectedActionId`
2. App tests for generic plan-action rendering
3. Claude tests for third action when resuming from a more permissive mode
4. Codex tests for synthetic plan approval and automatic implementation follow-up
5. Manager tests for post-permission state refresh
6. `npm run typecheck`