Add Codex MCP vs Claude parity audit report
This commit is contained in:
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ Build a new Codex MCP provider side‑by‑side with the existing Codex SDK prov
|
||||
- Permission abort/interrupt → session handles gracefully
|
||||
- Ensure test structure allows easy comparison between providers
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Audit**: Feature parity checklist for Codex MCP provider vs Claude provider.
|
||||
- [x] **Audit**: Feature parity checklist for Codex MCP provider vs Claude provider.
|
||||
|
||||
- Document all capabilities the Claude provider supports
|
||||
- Verify Codex MCP provider supports each one or document gaps
|
||||
@@ -383,7 +383,8 @@ Build a new Codex MCP provider side‑by‑side with the existing Codex SDK prov
|
||||
- Session persistence/resume
|
||||
- Abort/interrupt handling
|
||||
- Runtime info reporting
|
||||
- Mode switching
|
||||
- Mode switching
|
||||
- **Done (2025-12-24 23:35)**: WHAT: authored parity audit in `REPORT-codex-mcp-claude-parity.md:1` covering capabilities, gaps, and evidence lines; updated `plan.md:200` status. RESULT: Codex MCP vs Claude feature parity checklist documented with concrete gaps (modes, persistence, MCP servers, permissions). EVIDENCE: `REPORT-codex-mcp-claude-parity.md` contents summarizing code references.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Test (E2E)**: Comprehensive tool call coverage for Codex MCP provider.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user