feat(skill): add ask-user decision gate profile
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: ask-user-decision-gate
|
||||
description: "Use ask_user as a decision gate before high-stakes or ambiguous implementation choices."
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
short-description: Decision gate for ambiguity and high-stakes choices
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Ask User decision gate
|
||||
|
||||
Use this skill to force explicit user alignment before consequential decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
This skill is for decision control, not general chat.
|
||||
|
||||
## Trigger
|
||||
|
||||
Classify the next step as one of:
|
||||
|
||||
- `high_stakes`
|
||||
- `ambiguous`
|
||||
- `both`
|
||||
- `clear`
|
||||
|
||||
Use `ask_user` when the next step is ambiguous, preference-sensitive, or high-stakes and the user has not already made the decision explicitly.
|
||||
|
||||
### Treat as `high_stakes` when the next step changes:
|
||||
|
||||
- architecture, schema, API contract, deployment, or security posture
|
||||
- production-facing behavior in a costly-to-undo way
|
||||
- large refactors, migrations, or destructive edits
|
||||
|
||||
### Treat as `ambiguous` when:
|
||||
|
||||
- requirements or success criteria are missing/conflicting
|
||||
- multiple valid options exist and the trade-off is preference-sensitive
|
||||
- you would otherwise make a material assumption
|
||||
|
||||
## Handshake (required)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Gather evidence first from code/docs/tools.
|
||||
2. Summarize neutral context (current state, constraints, trade-offs, recommendation).
|
||||
3. Ask one focused `ask_user` decision question.
|
||||
4. Restate the user decision and proceed explicitly with it.
|
||||
5. Re-open only for materially new ambiguity.
|
||||
|
||||
## Question budget and escalation
|
||||
|
||||
- Max 1 `ask_user` call per decision boundary in normal cases.
|
||||
- Max 2 calls for the same boundary if first answer is unclear/cancelled.
|
||||
- Never re-ask the same trade-off without new evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
Attempt 2 (only if needed) must be narrower and include:
|
||||
|
||||
- `Proceed with recommended option`
|
||||
- `Choose another option`
|
||||
- `Stop for now`
|
||||
|
||||
After attempt 2:
|
||||
|
||||
- for `high_stakes` or `both`: stop as blocked until explicit decision
|
||||
- for `ambiguous` only: if user delegates ("your call"), proceed with the most reversible default and state assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
## ask_user payload quality
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask one concrete decision at a time.
|
||||
- Prefer 2-4 clear options (single-select by default).
|
||||
- Use `multi` only when selections are truly independent.
|
||||
- Keep option labels short and outcome-oriented.
|
||||
- Include trade-off descriptions when non-obvious.
|
||||
- Prefer non-`preview` questions when a free-form answer may be useful, since those include an internal `Type your own` option.
|
||||
|
||||
## Guardrails
|
||||
|
||||
- Do not ask before reading available context.
|
||||
- Do not use for trivial formatting/style micro-decisions.
|
||||
- Do not continue implementation after unclear high-stakes answers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Conflict rule
|
||||
|
||||
If this skill conflicts with implementation behavior or tests, the project contract wins:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `docs/contract.md`
|
||||
2. `tests/*.test.ts`
|
||||
3. this skill
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user