219 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
219 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
# Before/After: LinkedIn Style
|
|
|
|
Professional social media post transformations.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example 1: Career Advice
|
|
|
|
### Before (AI)
|
|
> Here's the thing about career advice that nobody wants to tell you:
|
|
>
|
|
> Most of it is survivorship bias dressed up as wisdom.
|
|
>
|
|
> The uncomfortable truth? The people giving advice succeeded for reasons they don't fully understand. Timing. Luck. Being in the right place.
|
|
>
|
|
> Not because they followed a playbook.
|
|
> Not because they "hustled harder."
|
|
> Not because they had a secret framework.
|
|
>
|
|
> Because circumstances aligned.
|
|
>
|
|
> Does this mean advice is useless? No.
|
|
>
|
|
> But it means you should:
|
|
> - Take it with a grain of salt
|
|
> - Understand the context it came from
|
|
> - Adapt it to YOUR situation
|
|
>
|
|
> The best career advice I ever got?
|
|
>
|
|
> "Pay attention to what works for YOU."
|
|
>
|
|
> And that's it. That's the whole thing.
|
|
>
|
|
> What's the best career advice you've received? Drop it in the comments. 👇
|
|
|
|
### After (Humanized)
|
|
> Most career advice is survivorship bias. Successful people explain their success with stories. The real causes—timing, luck, circumstance—don't make good LinkedIn posts.
|
|
>
|
|
> Useful advice is contextual. What worked for someone in 2015 at a 10-person startup won't transfer to your 2024 enterprise job.
|
|
>
|
|
> Pay attention to what works for you. Run experiments. Keep what helps.
|
|
|
|
### Changes Made
|
|
- Removed "Here's the thing" opener
|
|
- Cut "The uncomfortable truth?"
|
|
- Collapsed "Not because X. Not because Y. Not because Z." structure
|
|
- Removed rhetorical "Does this mean advice is useless? No."
|
|
- Cut bulleted list (converted to prose)
|
|
- Removed "And that's it. That's the whole thing."
|
|
- Cut engagement bait question and emoji
|
|
- 141 words → 62 words (56% reduction)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example 2: Leadership Insight
|
|
|
|
### Before (AI)
|
|
> I used to think great managers had all the answers.
|
|
>
|
|
> I was wrong. Dead wrong.
|
|
>
|
|
> Here's what I learned after managing teams for 10 years:
|
|
>
|
|
> The best managers don't solve problems.
|
|
> They create conditions for others to solve problems.
|
|
>
|
|
> Think about it:
|
|
> - When you solve everything, you become a bottleneck
|
|
> - When you empower others, you scale yourself
|
|
> - When you step back, leaders emerge
|
|
>
|
|
> This is genuinely hard. Our instincts scream "fix it!" But the real skill? Sitting with discomfort while someone else figures it out.
|
|
>
|
|
> The transformation happened when I started asking:
|
|
>
|
|
> "What do YOU think we should do?"
|
|
>
|
|
> Instead of:
|
|
>
|
|
> "Here's what I think we should do."
|
|
>
|
|
> Game. Changer.
|
|
>
|
|
> What's one management habit that transformed your leadership? Let me know below! 🙌
|
|
|
|
### After (Humanized)
|
|
> Good managers don't solve problems. They create conditions for others to solve problems.
|
|
>
|
|
> When you solve everything, you become a bottleneck. When you step back, leaders emerge from the team.
|
|
>
|
|
> One shift that worked: asking "What do you think we should do?" before offering my answer. Uncomfortable at first. Effective long-term.
|
|
|
|
### Changes Made
|
|
- Cut "I used to think / I was wrong" setup
|
|
- Removed "Dead wrong" emphasis
|
|
- Cut "Here's what I learned after managing teams for 10 years"
|
|
- Removed "Think about it:" and bullet structure
|
|
- Cut "This is genuinely hard"
|
|
- Removed "Game. Changer." dramatic fragment
|
|
- Cut engagement question and emoji
|
|
- 139 words → 63 words (55% reduction)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example 3: Hiring Post
|
|
|
|
### Before (AI)
|
|
> Hot take: your interview process is broken.
|
|
>
|
|
> And you probably don't even know it.
|
|
>
|
|
> Here's the uncomfortable truth about technical interviews:
|
|
>
|
|
> They test performance under artificial pressure.
|
|
> Not actual job skills.
|
|
>
|
|
> Whiteboard coding? Tests anxiety management.
|
|
> Take-home projects? Tests who has free time.
|
|
> Algorithm puzzles? Tests memorization.
|
|
>
|
|
> None of these predict on-the-job success.
|
|
>
|
|
> What actually works?
|
|
>
|
|
> ✅ Work sample tests on real problems
|
|
> ✅ Paid trial days
|
|
> ✅ Collaborative debugging sessions
|
|
> ✅ Reference checks (yes, really)
|
|
>
|
|
> The best hire I ever made bombed the algorithm round.
|
|
>
|
|
> The worst hire I ever made aced it.
|
|
>
|
|
> Let that sink in.
|
|
>
|
|
> Your interview process isn't selecting for talent. It's selecting for people who are good at interviews.
|
|
>
|
|
> Time to rethink. 💡
|
|
>
|
|
> Agree? Disagree? Let's debate in the comments.
|
|
|
|
### After (Humanized)
|
|
> Technical interviews test interview skills, not job skills.
|
|
>
|
|
> Whiteboard coding measures anxiety management. Algorithm puzzles measure memorization. Neither predicts job performance.
|
|
>
|
|
> Better alternatives: work samples from real problems, paid trial days, collaborative debugging. These show how candidates actually work.
|
|
>
|
|
> The best engineer I hired failed the algorithm round. The worst one aced it.
|
|
|
|
### Changes Made
|
|
- Removed "Hot take:" opener
|
|
- Cut "And you probably don't even know it"
|
|
- Removed "Here's the uncomfortable truth"
|
|
- Collapsed repetitive list structure
|
|
- Cut emoji checkmarks and bullet formatting
|
|
- Removed "Let that sink in"
|
|
- Cut "Time to rethink" and engagement prompt
|
|
- 136 words → 60 words (56% reduction)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example 4: Failure Story
|
|
|
|
### Before (AI)
|
|
> I got fired in 2019.
|
|
>
|
|
> Best thing that ever happened to me.
|
|
>
|
|
> Here's what nobody tells you about failure:
|
|
>
|
|
> It's not the end. It's data.
|
|
>
|
|
> When I lost my job, I thought my career was over. The shame was overwhelming. I didn't leave my apartment for a week.
|
|
>
|
|
> But then something shifted.
|
|
>
|
|
> I started asking: What can I learn from this?
|
|
>
|
|
> The answer?
|
|
> - I had been coasting
|
|
> - I wasn't growing
|
|
> - The company wasn't the right fit (and I knew it)
|
|
>
|
|
> Getting fired forced me to be honest with myself.
|
|
>
|
|
> Three months later, I landed a role that:
|
|
> ✨ Paid 40% more
|
|
> ✨ Aligned with my values
|
|
> ✨ Actually challenged me
|
|
>
|
|
> The point isn't that getting fired is good.
|
|
>
|
|
> The point is that setbacks contain information.
|
|
>
|
|
> Use them.
|
|
>
|
|
> What's a failure that turned into an opportunity for you?
|
|
|
|
### After (Humanized)
|
|
> I got fired in 2019. Didn't leave my apartment for a week.
|
|
>
|
|
> Eventually I asked what I could learn. Answers: I'd been coasting, not growing, and knew the company wasn't right.
|
|
>
|
|
> Three months later: a job that paid 40% more and actually challenged me. The firing forced honesty I'd been avoiding.
|
|
>
|
|
> Setbacks contain information. Use it.
|
|
|
|
### Changes Made
|
|
- Kept strong opening, cut "Best thing that ever happened to me"
|
|
- Removed "Here's what nobody tells you about failure"
|
|
- Cut "It's not the end. It's data." (cliché)
|
|
- Removed "But then something shifted" transition
|
|
- Collapsed bullet/emoji lists into prose
|
|
- Cut rhetorical "The point isn't X. The point is Y."
|
|
- Removed engagement question
|
|
- 149 words → 70 words (53% reduction)
|